Asta este legea cu care ma tot ameninta ei..mai precis facand referire la art.41
[ link extern ]
§ 41 Abroad with the child.
Who has joint custody or sole parental responsibility, you take the child on short trips abroad. If the parents have joint parental responsibility, the court may by order prohibit travel abroad with the child if it is uncertain whether the child will return. Prohibition may apply to a single trip or general, and may also be imposed in a case concerning parental responsibility with whom the child will live or visitation rights. The court may make an interim decision pending until the case is finally decided.
In cases where a disused travel ban, the child should be transferred from the passport of the person who will leave the country, or the child's passport be revoked, or the child may be placed second in a proper manner until the case is decided.
If there is a risk that the child will not return, the police may impose a temporary prohibition against until the case can be dealt with by the court. Other segment liabilities equivalent.
The parent who does not have parental responsibility may not travel abroad with the child without the consent of the parent who has custody. The court may, however, at the request of those who want to travel, consent to the child traveling abroad when it is obvious that the child will return. First paragraph, third and fourth sentences, shall apply accordingly to such consent.
Spune legea asta,ca daca EXISTA RISCUL sau banuiala..ca minorul sa nu se mai intoarca,prejudiciind celuilalt parinte dreptul de a-si mai putea exercita dreptul la vizita...
Eu nu am incercat sa spun nimanui sau sa induc in eroare ca o sa ma mai intorc cu copilul!!!
Le-am spus clar ca plec definitiv cu copilul in Romania ,tara de origine a mea ,a copilului si a tatalui inclusiv!
Cum i-si permit ei sa puna sechestru pe un copil care nu are nici unul din parinti norvegian sau cel putin cu o rezidenta permanenta !???